tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10614348.post1709937631495442930..comments2024-01-22T11:26:37.599-08:00Comments on TGD diary: How a sequence of quantum jumps could give rise to experience about continuous flow of time?Matti Pitkänenhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13512912323574611883noreply@blogger.comBlogger11125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10614348.post-40117375314628842852013-06-02T02:08:03.795-07:002013-06-02T02:08:03.795-07:00To Anonymous:
Someone sent the link to me. Too te...To Anonymous:<br /><br />Someone sent the link to me. Too technical and too far from my interests. Certainly interesting for mathematicians specialized in this kind of things.<br /><br />To Ulla:<br /><br />TGD allows monopole like fields. One can have two sheeted structure: I call these field wormhole magnetic field. <br /><br />The magnetic fluxes at parallel space-time sheets with extremely small distance are magnetic monopole fluxes running in opposite directions. The ends behave like pairs of monopoles with opposite charges but at different space-time sheets. Also elementary particles are this kind of structures. <br />Matpitka@luukku.comhttp://tgdtheory.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10614348.post-35335502800062502562013-06-02T01:52:29.226-07:002013-06-02T01:52:29.226-07:00Have you seen this? http://www.kurims.kyoto-u.ac.j...Have you seen this? http://www.kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~motizuki/Panoramic%20Overview%20of%20Inter-universal%20Teichmuller%20Theory.pdf Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10614348.post-44911949898088407482013-06-01T09:56:42.632-07:002013-06-01T09:56:42.632-07:00http://phys.org/news/2013-05-artificial-magnetic-m...http://phys.org/news/2013-05-artificial-magnetic-monopoles.html DISCOVERED.Ullahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16634036177244152897noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10614348.post-13755981507332377802013-05-31T17:36:51.450-07:002013-05-31T17:36:51.450-07:00>>>Particle physics is a dinosaur at the ...>>>Particle physics is a dinosaur at the verge of extinction: gigantic body controlled tiny ultraconservative reptile brains.<<<<br /><br />Or rather overblown and alienated neocortex lacking meaningfull communion with deeper (on holistically better connected) levels. As we say in Finnish, we have several brains (aivot), and human brains are exceptionally tuned with various "psychoactive" receptors that e.g. chimpanzees don't have, and which play a role in making all the "brains" act as coherent whole. This makes it possible for humans to delearn and relearn new and different ways to do the same task, allowing much faster evolution than chimps that during one lifetime cannot delearn a way to do a task once they have learned it. University professors and other Academic Alpha Males (and wannabees regardless of official definition of gender), great majority of whom don't drop acid (etc.), are more like chimps than normal humans: it takes a generation of few for a paradigm shift to be even possible. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10614348.post-46586354695595931902013-05-30T21:10:33.558-07:002013-05-30T21:10:33.558-07:00To Ulla:
TGD predicted holography years before it...<br />To Ulla:<br /><br />TGD predicted holography years before it became fashionable. 3-D surface as basic entity of physics together with general coordinate invariance implies holography: space-time surface is an analog for Bohr orbit. <br /><br />Strong form of holography is actually in question: partonic 2-surfaces +4-D tangent space data codes for quantum physics. Space-time surface and 4-D coding of physics is however needed to perform quantum measurements, where classical observables are needed ("pointer position" is classical variable). <br /><br />Gravitation is indeed almost absent at light-like 3-surfaces. For light-like 3-surfaces the induce metric is degenerate and Chern-Simons action does not depend on it at all. Boundary conditions involve however the four-metric so that theory does not reduce to topological quantum field theory.<br /><br />I must say that it is extremely boring to wait year after year that colleagues would rediscover the strong form of holography but development of physics is really slow process. If you read for instance Woit' posting at<br /><br /> http://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/?p=5946 <br /><br />you learn that the final dead end is reached after the findings at LHC concerning SUSY : Nima Arkani Hamed characterizes it by saying: "Physics is inevitable. Physics is impossible".<br /><br />In my daydreams I hope that colleagues would be finally mature to ask "What went wrong?". They do not however do this: they build a new and bigger particle accelerator instead. Particle physics is a dinosaur at the verge of extinction: gigantic body controlled tiny ultraconservative reptile brains.<br /><br />Matpitka@luukku.comhttp://tgdtheory.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10614348.post-1689881409585075012013-05-30T12:50:14.634-07:002013-05-30T12:50:14.634-07:00have
developed the method of holographic renormali...have<br />developed the method of holographic renormalization, which is the gravita-<br />tional counterpart of renormalization in QFT. The method is essential for<br />obtaining well-defined rules for computations in gravity/gauge theory duality and moreover it explicitly shows how spacetime is reconstructed from gauge theory data. Ultimately, this line of research should lead to a manifestly holographic reformulation of physics, thus completing the shift of paradigm. http://staff.science.uva.nl/~skenderi/research.pdf<br /><br />http://phys.org/news/2013-05-mathematical-links-space-time-theories.html<br /><br />Susskind?Ullahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16634036177244152897noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10614348.post-89347675458848351072013-05-27T07:08:34.409-07:002013-05-27T07:08:34.409-07:00http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/vaop/ncurrent...http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nature12186.html<br />N-C expansion and FQH effect as fractal pattern?Ullahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16634036177244152897noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10614348.post-66188960993937591972013-05-26T19:50:03.638-07:002013-05-26T19:50:03.638-07:00To Plato:
A natural identification for geometri...<br />To Plato:<br /><br /><br />A natural identification for geometric and algebraic thinking would be in terms of visual and linguistic cognition: imagination and internal speech. A possible TGD inspired consciousness theory interpretation would be in terms of dark photons and dark phonons decaying respectively to biophotons and biophonons (something new): visualization and internal speech.<br /><br /><br />Dark phonons could propagate along axonal membranes accompanying nerve pulses and potential waves and be due to the fact that cell membrane is an electret transforming electric to mechanical oscillations and vice versa.<br /><br />There are indications that biophotons are associated with right hemisphere. Could left hemisphere be specified to internal speech by dark phonon communications. Why right/left hemishere would have developed photon/phonon communications with very high value of hbar_eff? And does dark photon make sense!? <br /><br />[Note: String like objects at space-level connecting wormhole throats are basic prediction of TGD and their oscillations define 2-particle excitation being thus analogous to sound waves which would however propagate with light velocity.]<br /><br />Another possible interpretation is in terms of dark photons in two energy ranges: visible (biophotons) and those in IR near energy defined by cell membrane potential.<br /><br />A third one in terms of membrane potential oscillations giving rise to Sine-Gordon-Soliton sequences having sequence of mathematical penduli oscillating in phase. Nerve pulses would result from perturbations putting one pendulum in full rotation. This perturbation would propagate and give rise to nerve pulse.<br /><br />In any case, mathematical thinking might involve flexible transitions between the visual and linguistic modes. Writing has replaced playing with equations in my case: perhaps I am just too lazy and have also realized how fatally sticking to equations limits one's thinking. But most fundamental ideas of TGD are abstractions of visual thinking. <br /><br /> p-Adic numbers might represent basic example about how visual geometric thinking is replaced by algebraic one. p-Adics alone do not allow the notion of boundary or any of the topological invariances familiar from real context. <br /><br />In TGD framework these notions are however needed as their p-adic variants and the definition of p-adic manifold relies on the notion of chart maps with finite resolution between p-adic and real manifolds. plus the dynamics of Kahler action. The allows to transfer geometric notions like boundary, genus, etc... to p-adic context. Geometry expressed in terms of symmetries having both visual and algebraic representations is second key notion in real-to-p-adic transition.<br /><br />Matpitka@luukku.comhttp://tgdtheory.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10614348.post-1792573747273726542013-05-26T19:31:43.461-07:002013-05-26T19:31:43.461-07:00Dear Plato Hagel,
I got the following comment to ...<br />Dear Plato Hagel,<br /><br />I got the following comment to my emailer but for some reason it was not visible in blog. This happens now and then and I do not know for the reason. My response in separate email.<br />%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%<br /><br />Hi Matti,<br /><br />The following comment may shed more light on what I am saying.<br /><br />While one constructs the process toward some belief "when" is one truly <br />convinced? So the idea here of visual reasoning is a culmination of sorts <br />and quite revealing.<br /><br />For a man like Dirac he made good use of that process while analytically <br />describing with the math. He writes,<br /><br />When one is doing mathematical work, there are essentially two different <br />ways of thinking about the subject: the algebraic way, and the geometric <br />way. With the algebraic way, one is all the time writing down equations and <br />following rules of deduction, and interpreting these equations to get more <br />equations. With the geometric way, one is thinking in terms of pictures; <br />pictures which one imagines in space in some way, and one just tries to get <br />a feeling for the relationships between the quantities occurring in those <br />pictures. Now, a good mathematician has to be a master of both ways of <br />those ways of thinking, but even so, he will have a preference for one or <br />the other; I don't think he can avoid it. In my own case, my own preference <br />is especially for the geometrical way. (bold added by me for emphasis)<br /><br />%%%%<br />Matpitka@luukku.comhttp://tgdtheory.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10614348.post-80830988719634877192013-05-24T19:40:32.216-07:002013-05-24T19:40:32.216-07:00I am quantum Platonist: I assume no physical reali...<br />I am quantum Platonist: I assume no physical realities behind mathematical objects that I call zero energy states. There is no need for this since quantum jump between them causes the pain in my toe as I kick the stone.<br /><br />Sequence of state function reductions at opposite boundaries of CD defines conscious clock at either boundary of CD: conscious, non-conscious, conscious, nonconscius,... it goes: at this level one does not have any metric time. <br /><br />The above questions are about how this non-metric subjective time is mapped to a sequence of integers and then to a real valued space-time coordinate.<br /><br />I do not need a clock maker. Another manner to say this is that there is no eternal self, only self models defined by approximate invariants associated with quantum jumps as negentropically entangled structures defining potentially conscious memories and future visions and thus self model via "Akashic records".<br /><br />There is no beginning in subjective time in entire TGD Universe. For sub-CD born in quantum jump there is the first state function reduction and its age is finite integer. In geometric time there are boundaries of CDs at imbedding space level inducing end of space-time surfaces.<br /><br />I have not said anything about how the correlation between subjective time and geometric time emerges here. I leave it as an exercise;-).<br />Matpitka@luukku.comhttp://tgdtheory.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10614348.post-61170732480558384062013-05-24T11:10:12.902-07:002013-05-24T11:10:12.902-07:00If you are a Platonist, it is much easier to reco...If you are a <a href="http://www.eskesthai.com/2013/04/answers-to-question-interesting.html" rel="nofollow">Platonist</a>, it is much easier to reconcile?:)<br /><br />I can further question this in relation to what you are asking.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.eskesthai.com/2013/05/who-is-clockmaker.html" rel="nofollow">Who is the Clockmaker</a>?<br /><br />How does one ever begin to count? Pascal's triangle sets the emergence of a method to distinguish such counting?<br /><br /> Clock makers of the fourth dimension need a way in which to begin counting,yes?<br /><br />Best,PlatoHagelhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00849253658526056393noreply@blogger.com