tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10614348.post3073502060679131185..comments2024-01-22T11:26:37.599-08:00Comments on TGD diary: Direct evidence for dark DNA?!Matti Pitkänenhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13512912323574611883noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10614348.post-36534889900102690672015-07-24T20:56:19.618-07:002015-07-24T20:56:19.618-07:00
I must confess that I feel myself frustrated now...<br /> I must confess that I feel myself frustrated now and then.<br />I have few years left and I work like a horse to articulate TGD views so that it would be easy for those to come learn it and the official academic science refuses to even admit even my existence. I know - a stupidity of even this caliber should not be reason for me to lose my temper. Human stupidity is simply a fundamental renewing resource - I cannot do anything for it.<br /><br />I have said what follows many times but is so important that I do not bother to represent excuses for repeating myself instead of doing my best to be just entertaining.<br /><br /> For last decade I have been developing a radically new vision having its roots in Quantum TGD: dark matter as quintessence of life. Genetic code would be realised in terms of dark proton sequences and biochemistry would be only a shadow of what happens at the level of dark matter. This is a revolutionary idea. I wish so much that a typical academic reader could somehow get this point if he ever reads the above lines. <br /><br />This vision of course remains a mere useless speculation unless I manage to bind it with empiria. I have worked for a decade to identify anomalies having explanation in terms of dark matter.<br /><br /> This finding about strange behavior of DNA looks very much like anomaly and gives a direct support for one key aspect of this view: realisation of genetic code already at the level of dark nuclear physics- large h_eff etc… The believe that biochemistry is behind genetic code would be a huge mistake created by the belief in reductionistic dogma. <br /><br />Even better - this hypothesis also gives excellent hopes for understanding why the attempt to explain genetic code in terms of biochemistry yields something so ugly as wobble hypothesis. At the deeper level everything would be elegant. <br /><br /> Here I could try to talk about huge importance of real understanding of biology for medicine to stir the interest of the reader interested in future applications. <br /><br />Problems do not get old, solutions do. What I love in science is that old dead dogmas are eventually replaced by better theories. This process has started now. I expected that the revolution would begin from theoretical elementary particle physics but condensed matter physicists, biologists and neuroscientists seem to be doing it while particle physicists are concentrating on desperate attempts to keep SUSY and superstrings alive.<br /><br />Sorry, I got emotional;-). Sometimes it cannot be avoided.<br />Matpitka@luukku.comhttp://tgdtheory.fi/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10614348.post-19663803737541709712015-07-24T13:06:58.068-07:002015-07-24T13:06:58.068-07:00Matti, concerning the, wobble hypothesis you obvi...Matti, concerning the, wobble hypothesis you obviously have not seen my 'quasic:' chart of my weeks moment of 1974. We are old warriors on the next new frontiers. But do any of us have time just to duplicate the same old ideas? With respect & little time left, and a struggle with detractors, your take on new physics and wisdom should better be free to focus on and discover new things at the frontier<br />Yours is an example that should inspire generations of young inquirers.L. Edgar Ottohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00525169618204198073noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10614348.post-83702092068962482262015-07-24T00:16:19.256-07:002015-07-24T00:16:19.256-07:00
My view is that precise quantitative predictions ...<br />My view is that precise quantitative predictions are the candle in the cake when theory has been really understood. First the principles, then qualitative models, general expressions for say scattering amplitudes, and finally calculational algorithms. <br /><br />M-theory and actually the entire TOE approach tried to go directly to the third stage and failed miserably: the super stringy explanation of the 2 TeV bump mentioned in a another posting is a comic manifestation of the wrong order of things. <br /><br />One must predict first correctly the significant bits. Dark DNA might represent one of these significant bits forcing to change entire world view: just single bit! See for instance the possible clarification it brings to the understanding of the peculiar ugly features of genetic code such as non-uniquencess and wobbling phenomenon.Matpitka@luukku.comhttp://tgdtheory.fi/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10614348.post-18149310197153685972015-07-23T09:29:45.807-07:002015-07-23T09:29:45.807-07:00Matti, only in the last decade have ideas of quant...Matti, only in the last decade have ideas of quantum effects say on the scale of a brain been taken seriously by more and more thinkers. But do we not have the idea of jumping genes? (How some confluence of gene material may 'know at a distance another has been deleted'?<br />This post is a qualitative speculation, not to say a profound general breakthrough by a few brave physics and mathematical thinkers, and this poet, independently converge to similar or ultimate considerations... Such as the genome and dark matter, black holes or worm holes, qm effects on a hierarchy of various levels or of a hierarchy of fundamental constants. Vague or indefinite things intuitively based on vague things.<br />But what about quantitative measure? For example, if I asserted qualitatively we can have an explicit calculation for something like string or (brane) theory weights - Pitkanen particle states based on prime number theory (p-adic, Gaussian etc...) concepts could as well implied or in actuality be applied to the background of the DNA-RNA systems qualitatively in the role of organic or inorganic expression, although we have not explicitly shown the simple arithmetic or topology save in theory, including the generalization as you point out for Nature's various forms of error correction to complete gaps for healing both in the body and the brain.<br /><br />This is what my quasics is all about in the sense explicit middle ground between the qualitative and quantitative, where these can be physically realized as a universe of quasifinite modeling. In this we tend to make surprising simulations such as the generation problem applied to Nova explosions or particle and biological symmetries.L. Edgar Ottohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00525169618204198073noreply@blogger.com