tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10614348.post5111569436466158968..comments2024-01-22T11:26:37.599-08:00Comments on TGD diary: Black holes and TGDMatti Pitkänenhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13512912323574611883noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10614348.post-9210267629941181022012-10-24T06:20:06.644-07:002012-10-24T06:20:06.644-07:00Within the bounds of possibility, one and only one...Within the bounds of possibility, one and only one G value<br />produces an all-pervasive pattern of numerical coincidences<br />among the fundamental physical constants: product of the<br />magnetic constant and square of the fine structure constant.<br />Since so many of the coincidences involve quantities with<br />differing units, an impropriety in the use of units is implied.<br />www.outlawmapofphysics.comJohn Aikmanhttp://www.outlawmapofphysics.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10614348.post-50909877317322561552012-08-10T23:48:35.491-07:002012-08-10T23:48:35.491-07:00Cahill
http://www.flinders.edu.au/science_engineer...Cahill<br />http://www.flinders.edu.au/science_engineering/caps/our-school/staff-postgrads/academic-staff/cahill-reg/process-physics/<br /><br />The new theory of gravity which has emerged from Process Physics is in agreement with all experiments and observations. This theory has two gravitational constants: G, the Newtonian gravitational constant, and a second dimensionless constant which experiment has revealed to be the fine structure constant. This theory explains the so-called `dark matter' effect in spiral galaxies, the bore hole gravitational anomalies, the masses of the observed black holes at the centres of globular clusters and spherical galaxies, and the anomalies in Cavendish laboratory measurements of G. As well it gives a parameter-free account of the supernovae Hubble expansion data without the need for dark energy, dark matter nor accelerating universe. This reveals that the Friedmann equations are inadequate for describing the universe expansion dynamics.<br /><br />In short, rather than the static 4-dimensional modelling of present day (non-process) physics, Process Physics is providing a dynamic model where space and quantum matter emerge from a fundamentally random but self-organising system. The key insight is that to adequately model reality we must move on from the traditional non-process syntactical information modelling to a process semantic information modelling; such information is `internally meaningful'.<br /><br /><br />Meaning? Action? Maybe you have something to say?<br />Negentropy as meaning in itself without help from p-adics and primes? He focus on logic?<br /><br />http://www.flinders.edu.au/science_engineering/caps/our-school/staff-postgrads/spec-page/cahill/objects-of-meaning.cfmUllahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16634036177244152897noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10614348.post-34109178015254640372012-08-04T00:44:27.132-07:002012-08-04T00:44:27.132-07:00Ed Witten can also be listened to. http://www.scie...Ed Witten can also be listened to. http://www.sciencemag.org/content/337/6094/538/suppl/DC1Ullahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16634036177244152897noreply@blogger.com