tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10614348.post5692762976300056469..comments2024-01-22T11:26:37.599-08:00Comments on TGD diary: DNA, speech, music, and ordinary soundMatti Pitkänenhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13512912323574611883noreply@blogger.comBlogger20125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10614348.post-73589401140793546422012-06-26T03:41:49.759-07:002012-06-26T03:41:49.759-07:00To Ulla:
New particles would be highly desirable...To Ulla: <br /><br />New particles would be highly desirable from TGD view point. <br /><br />TGD "almost-predicts" - not only some exotic particles- but entier scaled up copies of hadron physics, one of them should be seen sooner or later at LHC and the Higgs candidates and dark matter candidates would both be identifiable as pion like states of this new hadron physics.matpitka@luukku.comhttp://tgdtheory.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10614348.post-45753374477584878722012-06-25T09:12:44.493-07:002012-06-25T09:12:44.493-07:00Sorry for my existence :(
This must cheer you up ...Sorry for my existence :(<br /><br />This must cheer you up a bit. <br /><br />http://www.nature.com/nmat/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nmat3358.html<br /><br />Here we show that the exchange of spin waves between extended topological defects, such as domain walls, can result in novel magnetic states. The magnetic modulation has a very long period of 340 Å at 3 K and exhibits an anomalously large number of higher-order harmonics. These domain walls are formed by Ising-like Tb spins. They interact by exchanging magnons propagating through the Fe magnetic sublattice. The resulting force between the domain walls has a rather long range that determines the period of the incommensurate state and is analogous to the pion-mediated Yukawa interaction between protons and neutrons in nuclei. With pics.<br /><br />In my eyes looks like attracting/repelling waves, also found for the Casimir effect. This COULD indicate a ZEO?<br /><br />Picture text: The ‘8-armed candlestick' in this unusual image of the measurements is proof that the ‘walls’ of the domains in TbFeO3 repel each other at certain temperatures and therefore lie at a fixed distance from each other. <br /><br />http://trs-new.jpl.nasa.gov/dspace/bitstream/2014/17852/1/99-1302.pdfUllahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16634036177244152897noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10614348.post-59242870550728809802012-06-24T13:04:08.830-07:002012-06-24T13:04:08.830-07:00Gauge forces I meant in above, sorry.
Could this...Gauge forces I meant in above, sorry. <br /><br />Could this one be something? Kaluza Klein in effective 2D dimensions by Holger Nielsen et co. 2911, at least references can be good?<br /><br />http://iopscience.iop.org/1367-2630/13/10/103027/fulltext/<br /><br />Now I stop and try to learn instead. This was really eye-opening for me. Now I can relate things much better, and even understand where Kea stranded. How could she even for a second believe that the LHC results meant she was wrong? No, because she did something completely different. Quantum gravity on a Matrix :) As you said :)Ullahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16634036177244152897noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10614348.post-91365100362013960372012-06-24T08:43:50.903-07:002012-06-24T08:43:50.903-07:00Doesn't a new particle give TGD troubles? I un...Doesn't a new particle give TGD troubles? I understood the dimensions in TGD are built on the particles generations? But this is no fourth generation?<br /><br />What would a fourth generation mean?Ullahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16634036177244152897noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10614348.post-44320901470436087452012-06-22T23:31:14.596-07:002012-06-22T23:31:14.596-07:00ThePesla:
Maybe you refer to Lubos's latest p...ThePesla:<br /><br />Maybe you refer to Lubos's latest posting about Higgs. Lubos continues to make his weird identification of "new particle" and "Higgs" and rants against experimentalists who have more balanced view.<br /><br />It is highly probable that a new particle is discovered: hardly anyone disagrees about this. But its identification as Higgs without testing rates in all decay channels that Higgs should have, is very weird- to put it mildly. Lubos himself would probably use "idiotic" instead of "weird" here. <br /><br />Existing data are not consistent with the identification as standard model Higgs. I remember also article claiming that also SUSY Higgs interpretation is in difficulties. And SUSY itself is to high degree excluded.<br /><br />It it of course possile that the data of last year are still too meagrer and statistical fluctuations will explain the discrepancies. We simply do not know.<br /><br />There are also the recent findings of Fermi suggesting particles at 145 GeV and perhaps also at around 125 GeV - interpreted as candidates for dark matter particles- raising the question about identification for 125 GeV and earlier 145 GeV bump (reported by CDF ) proposed to be Higgs. <br /><br />Dark particles as Higgses? Certainly not! Higgs interpretation in this case is out of question but TGD inspired interpretation as particles analogous to pions of scaled up variant of hadron physics "almost-predicted" by TGD might make sense. This would mean a nice convergence of information from totally different sources.<br /><br />But again: the identification of this particle with Higgs reflects to me the strange extremist character of Lubos's belief system manifesting also in his opinions about climate, climate researchers, about intelligence of those who do not have white skin or happen to be women, his vision about "leftists" as criminals, and so on....matpitka@luukku.comhttp://tgdtheory.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10614348.post-65683611158182880152012-06-22T08:19:55.294-07:002012-06-22T08:19:55.294-07:00Orwin,
Not sure which Lubos comment you referred ...Orwin,<br /><br />Not sure which Lubos comment you referred to but he has a post today which considers something he regards as a new approach... however, I put it much more clearly and general today on my blog (another coincidence of synchronicity?) and<br /><br />Ulla, this also answers some questioned in your comments here.<br /><br />Cheers, the PeSlaL. Edgar Ottohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00525169618204198073noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10614348.post-33112170976474804092012-06-22T06:02:49.304-07:002012-06-22T06:02:49.304-07:00Wikipedia has this note on Chain of Beings: This i...Wikipedia has this note on Chain of Beings: This idea of a great chain of being can be traced to Plato's division of the world into the Forms, which are full beings, and sensible things, which are imitations of the Forms and are both being and not being.<br /><br />Assumption: FORM was prior to function? As Matter is thought to be prior to living matter. Form is a result, though.<br /><br />Now we look at the functions, the bindings and couplings that result in dimensions and form?<br /><br />Einstein's theory of general relativity shows that the true geometry of spacetime is not Euclidean geometry. For example, if a triangle is constructed out of three rays of light, then in general the interior angles do not add up to 180 degrees due to gravity. Wikipedia.<br /><br />http://demonstrations.wolfram.com/NonEuclideanTriangleContinuum/<br /><br />and basically the hadron? But the SELF?<br /><br />http://physics.technion.ac.il/~odim/hofstadter.html note the cold/warm areas as shifts. Compare to Berry curvature and massgaps.<br /><br />http://rspa.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/465/2104/1173.full.pdf+html light and timeUllahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16634036177244152897noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10614348.post-79237827881521873102012-06-21T14:43:54.712-07:002012-06-21T14:43:54.712-07:00To ThePesla:
Covariant tensors demonstrate Leibni...To ThePesla:<br /><br />Covariant tensors demonstrate Leibniz' Chain Rule, unlike contravariant/affine. I think the rule was named after the Great Chain of Being, now understood as orders (in Descartes' sense) of structure: 2D, 3D, etc. <br /><br />Prime dimensionality follows from Chinese Number Theorem! At level 5, which is hard in Kahler: cf Lubos' remark.<br /><br />On binaries: I think bits of probability, degrees of freedom (df). Are we too literal with dimensions/geometry? Spin is distinct df! So what about charge and parity? And CPT theorem as dimensions, curced by parity violation??Orwinnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10614348.post-28612295788463276922012-06-21T12:51:52.740-07:002012-06-21T12:51:52.740-07:00http://www.genomicron.evolverzone.com/2012/06/a-go...http://www.genomicron.evolverzone.com/2012/06/a-gouldian-view-of-the-genome-venice-italy-may-10-2012/<br />Ryan Gregory gave a talk on A Gouldian view of the genome and he has posted the video of his presentation (see below). I urge you to watch the whole thing but, if you only have a few minutes, then watch the beginning where Ryan describes the important lessons that Gould taught us.<br /><br /> Narrative: The details of "pure history" are important.<br /> Origins: The reasons a trait first evolved and why it still exists may be different.<br /> Exaptation: Features can become co-opted to serve new functions.<br /> Development: The connections between genotype and phenotype are important<br /> Pluralism: Small genetic changes accumulating slowly over time due to natural selection is not all there is.<br /> Contingency: Unique events can have a large influence in the long run, even if they seem minor initially.<br /> Hierarchy: Evolutionary processes can occur at multiple levels.<br /> Scholarship: Know the history of one's field.<br /><br />The strange thing about this list is that almost everyone will say they know all these lessons. Some will even argue that the list is trivial and Gould's legacy is overblown. However, in normal discourse it turns out that most people "forget" these lessons and it's only when push comes to shove that they acknowledge them—even then the acknowledgement is reluctant and sprinkled with caveats. <br /><br />http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=Ta8Rg4S4b7IUllahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16634036177244152897noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10614348.post-12022799761798134492012-06-21T12:22:28.370-07:002012-06-21T12:22:28.370-07:00http://physicsforme.wordpress.com/2012/06/21/dark-...http://physicsforme.wordpress.com/2012/06/21/dark-matter-tracks-could-give-earliest-view-of-universe/<br /><br />and production of a hole in a quantum dot http://www.onlineinvestingai.com/blog/2009/02/04/whats-the-spin-on-quantum-dots/Ullahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16634036177244152897noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10614348.post-74206697737625334742012-06-21T11:03:04.096-07:002012-06-21T11:03:04.096-07:00PeSla,
No books in Finnish thinking will help you ...PeSla,<br />No books in Finnish thinking will help you understand Mattis mind :)Ullahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16634036177244152897noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10614348.post-70871503266707376202012-06-21T11:00:11.103-07:002012-06-21T11:00:11.103-07:00Orwin,
Those words of Bergson I think is very much...Orwin,<br />Those words of Bergson I think is very much up to date. Think wormhole and time/speed. Or the difference between NO and HO in biology?<br /><br />I just feel I know absolutely nothing, my brain is totally blank, so thanks :)<br /><br />I have looked at Tony Smith's I'Ching thinking linked to Lie, but to say it is fractal? It is also here. I have another idea about DNA, which still is premature. It has with purine/pyrimidines to do, as here. There are 'words' or 'boxes' in DNA, different from codons. Maybe the codons are just a small glimpse?<br /><br />These dam Kähler fields and CP2 fields and time, gravity link are overwhelming, also when they are linked to mind and consciousness. My intuition tells me there are something lost, but what? The Soul? <br /><br />Why Maxwell solution is preferred, I cannot either understand, when gravity is doing the deformations in WCW, creating tensions/energy. There is also a world outside energy and E=mc^2, which we cannot measure by em-fields, but maybe on matrix with holes? In spiritual thinking you must still all your senses to be able to hear this 'unified U-matrix'? DC-current is about holes/particles, as is acup. The old Chinese medicine also talk about the origin of Chi in this way. As do biology with creation of acids as markers. Acid is protons. This Moffat had another solution than Einstein, in http://arxiv.org/pdf/gr-qc/0506021v7.pdf Scalar-Tensor-Vector Gravity Theory, which makes me think at Kea very much.<br /><br />An easier (?) way to do this is to look at the duality/trinity and condensed matter? The many-body problem ,like the Feynman diagrams, in TGD should be made of these, ('emergence' of hologram) but I got no answer.<br /><br />So,I feel very blank :)Ullahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16634036177244152897noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10614348.post-31400044443173900592012-06-21T09:35:43.314-07:002012-06-21T09:35:43.314-07:00ulla et al:
http://scienceandreason.blogspot.com/...ulla et al:<br /><br />http://scienceandreason.blogspot.com/2011/08/amino-acid-alphabet.htmlL. Edgar Ottohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00525169618204198073noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10614348.post-33080058109858800772012-06-21T09:27:47.725-07:002012-06-21T09:27:47.725-07:00Matti et al,
The third base of a codon (as if it ...Matti et al,<br /><br />The third base of a codon (as if it once said the DNA code was really a 2and a half code can be seen as an artifact of the binary (I Ching analog) structure. Some think our code once had 4 lines for the 6 in the enumeration of codons and clearly one can ask as well as propose a reading of 8 lines for a 256 system which can now be shown that DNA can be read that way. <br /><br />But it is not that simple as there are layers of the code anyway and 64 is certainly related to 3space models. Plus one achieved different complexity in the reading of the code backwards and the simple count of the mass of the atoms that make up a protein.<br /><br />Beyond the zeta function ideas and in relation to raw numbers, the integers being flat (45degree) slope between convergence and divergence we may ask is there a limit to the dimensions expressed as 256 is presumably symmetry in four space (or alternatively does this show only a first few of certain Fermat like primes.<br /><br />In general I imagine these odd patterns and natural generational count shifts in nature in that primes have no simple formula that this is a strength to the diversity possible in a theory and only seems in our time (or perhaps we biased by our 64 DNA structure as the ground) instead of a chaos of confusion are uncertainty of what is coincidence in numbers. We in effect in theory have to generalize the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic in the uniqueness question beyond our debate of the linguistic or mechanical elements that underlay our theories.<br /><br />Clearly in matters of count or computation the Kantian stance can reasserted itself again as part of the picture coming by the discrete into the back door. But this does not detract from the continuous and more linguistic Platonic models that are also needed.<br /><br />In theory on the debate level one man's quality can be a quantity of another. We are constantly interchanging stereotypes and archetypes this way quite beside our confused probability measures without a wider view such as TGD.<br /><br />As far as putting abstract ideas on a fourfold base system let us consider also 8 or more base readings now shown to be possible where these structures arise.<br /><br />ThePeSla at the library not the coffee shop.L. Edgar Ottohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00525169618204198073noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10614348.post-56985579932987589742012-06-21T07:45:47.719-07:002012-06-21T07:45:47.719-07:00BTW My local library had no books on Finish consi...BTW My local library had no books on Finish considering the influence of that nation for physics over the last couple of decades I thought a birdseye view of the words and structure would help our communication and my understanding.<br /><br />PeSL. Edgar Ottohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00525169618204198073noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10614348.post-63723635239372507792012-06-21T07:37:47.233-07:002012-06-21T07:37:47.233-07:00Fracticality,
Without getting lost in DNA and I C...Fracticality,<br /><br />Without getting lost in DNA and I Ching 101 you can find a more modern analysis on my blog at it was meant to be understood, by Leibniz at the dawn of the computer age noting the binary patterns (1600's) There is a great deal more to this than sacred geometry.<br /><br />Matti,<br /><br />Your last few questions and explorations were most interesting it would be nice if we could work together some on the prime numbers involved as theory.<br /><br />The PeSla<br /><br />All: rhea or word In the beginning God spoke the world into existence. and later "logos" or word in the new testament. Who wrote the so called cosmic library? Is this difference not that of Bergson on one side in the usual debate between sensations and reductionist? We go deep beyond and before the ancient texts Ulla and for some of us who know that no one knows such answers- well we have a few new answers never seen before.<br /><br />Now MATTI, just as one may conclude there are only five loops (Lubos awhile back presumably after reading us) Can the sheets have a specific cycle of five as in the Euclidean geometry? or some finite number- is this answerable with what we know of the infinity of primes?L. Edgar Ottohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00525169618204198073noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10614348.post-35820826302977813272012-06-21T06:57:11.506-07:002012-06-21T06:57:11.506-07:00Ulla, Bergson is echoing a broad Indian tradition ...Ulla, Bergson is echoing a broad Indian tradition of vijnanadvaita, running from Buddhist vijnana to Advaita Vedanta, in which the perceived object is a construct, and must be suppressed to reveal the void or medium (akasha). This Wilber et al just don't know: nobody owns it as their doctrine!!!<br /><br />Also intelligible sound is the subtle body, but there's an equilibrium involved, the focus of Patanjali yoga. So you'all are still on track, and ahead of the pack.<br /><br />Here's an E8 I Ching genetics: http://www.valdostamuseum.org/hamsmith/ichgene6.htmlOrwinnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10614348.post-5713083560753363432012-06-20T20:04:14.246-07:002012-06-20T20:04:14.246-07:00Matti:
Massless Extremal = Mathematically-program...Matti:<br /><br />Massless Extremal = Mathematically-programmed beam?<br /><br /><br />Adenine = TIME<br />Thiamine = SPACE<br />Guanine = MIND<br />Cytosine = RADIANCE<br /><br />There are 64 letters written with 4 amino acids. 64 = 4 CUBED.<br /><br />Each of the 64 codons is written with 3 of the 4 amino acids to create mathematically 64. <br /><br />6 line structures - identical to the HEXAGRAMS OF THE I-CHING.<br /><br />In the Fibonacci sequence, the harmonic numbers 5, 8, 13 are relevant:<br /><br />5 creates the PENTATONIC SCALE.<br /><br />8 creates the DIATONIC SCALE.<br /><br />13 creates the CHROMATIC scale.<br /><br />DNA programs are derived from the Akashic records.<br /><br />These genetic programs are determined in accord with the karmic disposition of the entity that will incarnate on Earth.<br /><br />How is DNA dispersed? How did it get to planet Earth?◘Fractality◘noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10614348.post-70942174605140208812012-06-20T01:08:36.754-07:002012-06-20T01:08:36.754-07:00Bergson says that reality has extension as well as...Bergson says that reality has extension as well as duration. However, space is not a void or vacuum which is filled by reality. Things are not in space, space is in things. Thus, emptiness can only be conceptualized by suppressing a space-occupying reality. Similarly, nothingness can only be conceptualized by suppressing the awareness of being. According to Bergson, emptiness cannot be directly perceived, it can only be conceptualized.<br /><br />Seems to be a wise man.Ullahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16634036177244152897noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10614348.post-11507355237302707772012-06-19T19:59:22.125-07:002012-06-19T19:59:22.125-07:00I got as email the following comment from Anonymou...I got as email the following comment from Anonymous:<br /><br />"Undeniably believe that which you said. Your favorite reason appeared to be on the web the simplest thing to be aware of. I say to you, I certainly get irked while people consider worries that they just do not know about. You managed to hit the nail upon the top and also defined out the whole thing without having side effect , people could take a signal. Will likely be back to get more. Thanks "<br /><br />For some reason the comment does not however appear on the blog so that I add it by hand.matpitka@luukku.comhttp://tgdtheory.com/noreply@blogger.com