tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10614348.post1319104294320086074..comments2024-01-22T11:26:37.599-08:00Comments on TGD diary: p-Adic physics as physics of cognition and imaginationMatti Pitkänenhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13512912323574611883noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10614348.post-58108314953858121382015-06-06T08:34:00.366-07:002015-06-06T08:34:00.366-07:00http://www.theory.caltech.edu/~preskill/talks/Pres...http://www.theory.caltech.edu/~preskill/talks/Preskill-KITP-holographic-2015Ullahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16634036177244152897noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10614348.post-16968621116246223642015-05-31T19:08:00.195-07:002015-05-31T19:08:00.195-07:00This comment has been removed by the author.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10614348.post-52859043969442699202015-05-31T18:54:49.038-07:002015-05-31T18:54:49.038-07:00http://www.jasoncolavito.com/blog/review-of-ancien...http://www.jasoncolavito.com/blog/review-of-ancient-aliens-s05e05-the-einstein-factor<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10614348.post-5519509356950875092015-05-29T07:45:44.603-07:002015-05-29T07:45:44.603-07:00
The primes appear at deeper level: at the level ...<br /><br />The primes appear at deeper level: at the level of number field (extension of rationals) for the parameters characterising the space-time surfaces. Space-time and space-time curvature are higher level concepts: relate to primes like sociology to elementary particle physics;-) .<br />Matpitka@luukku.comhttp://tgdtheory.fi/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10614348.post-20141750073647331762015-05-29T06:41:34.877-07:002015-05-29T06:41:34.877-07:00Maybe (the tree of ) primes are not bent or curved...Maybe (the tree of ) primes are not bent or curved in the same way as spacetime?Ullahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16634036177244152897noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10614348.post-6779166261714399802015-05-28T19:42:00.202-07:002015-05-28T19:42:00.202-07:00Sorry for illogical statement and thank you for no...Sorry for illogical statement and thank you for noticing it. My purpose was not to state it in this manner. The original vision - a couple of years ago or so- was that living matter can be said to reside in this intersection of realities and p-adicities- sensory and cognitive. <br /><br />The questions are: what is living matter, sensory, cognitive, and intersection! <br /><br />I have now mathematically sound answers to these questions in the conceptual framework provided by TGD (only in this framework of course!)<br /><br /> A more precise statement is that the core of this posting: both matter and cognition can be said to reside in this intersection: "genes of space-time" are in the intersection as 2-D string wold sheets and partonic 2-surfaces, one might say. <br /><br />Imagined and real differ in that pure figment of imagination cannot be continued by holography to real space-time surface but can be done so to p-adic 4-surfaces because of pseudo constant phenomenon. This is mathematically sound definition: mathematics is full of this kind continuation problems of type "given boundary conditions can one find a solution of field equations". <br /><br />Dream reality consisting of pieces glued together illogically could be seen as example of imagination. And of course, this posting too;-). <br />Matpitka@luukku.comhttp://tgdtheory.fi/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10614348.post-83431266943558109662015-05-28T13:41:07.221-07:002015-05-28T13:41:07.221-07:00The strongest motivation is the vision about livin...The strongest motivation is the vision about living matter as something residing in the intersection of real and p-adic worlds. <br /><br />How do you know that not all matter follow this rule? I think it must be so, so we still doesn't know what differ ordinary and living matter.Ullahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16634036177244152897noreply@blogger.com