tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10614348.post2330570106163615977..comments2024-01-22T11:26:37.599-08:00Comments on TGD diary: Have leptoquarks been observed in B meson decays?Matti Pitkänenhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13512912323574611883noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10614348.post-19763431609789965372015-03-05T06:40:45.087-08:002015-03-05T06:40:45.087-08:00Hi Matti,
Thank you for your interesting reaction,...Hi Matti,<br />Thank you for your interesting reaction, about the purpose of life of the electron I deformed some of the ideas of Bohm and Vigier described in::<br />http://vixra.org/pdf/1111.0061v1.pdf<br />called:<br />Black hole horizon curvature dependent balance between plasma creation and e-e+ annihilation in Quantum FFF Theory.<br />At Page: 26, I describe the parallel of my propeller fermions, pushed around by the oscillating Higgs field with Bohm Vigier ideas:: <br />“David Peat described in his book "Infinite Potential" the gist of the problem, as follows: "Bohm argued that his "quantum potential" guides the electron in a non-mechanical way. But how exactly it operates was less clear.<br />Vigier favored explaining the process in terms of some sort of underlying mechanism- a subquantum<br />fluid, perhaps. In his opinion the electron exchanges energy and momentum with<br />this fluid and in this sense the electron is "pushed along" (by the fluid).<br />Bohm went along with Vigier for a time, but eventually he felt that his theory was being<br />forced too far back in the direction of Classical Physics. The two men simply drifted apart in<br />their philosophies."<br />...For Vigier, however, the crisis of the theory lay in the problem of nonlocality. The question<br />of nonlocality is basic to the original debate between Bohr and Einstein on "Independent<br />elements of reality".<br />Einstein argued that if the quantum objects are far enough apart, they must be independent;<br />since quantum theory could not account for this fact, then the theory had to be incomplete.<br />Bohr countered that quantum systems are an "Un-analysable Whole". This wholeness, present<br />in Bohm's theory, implied non-locality."<br />However, in this paper, it is assumed that Dual Anti-Mirror Symmetry and BigBangEntanglement, (BBE) is the base for consciousness on all levels of existence. At the same time, we must be able in the future to<br />measure the "Un-analysable Whole" of multiple Copy Universes, by more precise human<br />intention/reaction experiments as Benjamin Libet did before.<br />Leo Vuyk leovuyk@gmail.comhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16285797359437018414noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10614348.post-53577733232244397922015-03-05T05:33:10.878-08:002015-03-05T05:33:10.878-08:00The idea about association of function to objects ...<br />The idea about association of function to objects of size of elementary particle looks weird. Certainly the notion of function goes outside the realm of existing physics since it requires the notions of intention, goal, and behavior, and consciousness.<br /><br /> In Zero Energy Ontology however systems are 4-D and even elementary particles with non-standard value of Planck constant (h_eff/h=n) could have self lasting for few quantum jumps (repeated state function reductions at same boundary of CD). This would give rise to self-organisation and "behaviour" in very primitive sense. Even elementary particle or at least its dark variant with non-standard Planck constant could have behavioral patterns in very primitive sense. I however find difficult to speak about purpose of life of electron;-). <br />Matpitka@luukku.comhttp://tgdtheory.fi/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10614348.post-48369035802460781032015-03-05T05:26:10.157-08:002015-03-05T05:26:10.157-08:00You mention knots. I believe that knottiness makes...You mention knots. I believe that knottiness makes sense at elementary particle level but that effects are extremely delicate. According to an estimate that I made years ago, they are totally out of reach of recent day technology since effects on mass<br />values are so incredible small.<br /><br /> The scattering amplitudes in the generalisation of twistor approach to TGD based on 8-D twistors can be seen as analogs of braid invariants. The fermion lines identified as light-like boundaries of string world sheets at the orbits of partonic 2-surfaces are braided. <br /><br />Braiding would however have nothing to do with elementary particle quantum numbers and would not be visible at QFT limit. Since the only fundamental fermionic vertex is 2-vertex there are no infinities and OZI rule holds true: hence braids.<br /><br /> TGD can be seen as a generalisation of braid theory in this approach: almost topological QFT. The construction of scattering amplitudes would be analogous to that for knot invariants: in particular, the problems caused by non-planar diagrams would be solved by recursion transforming non-planar diagrams to superpositions of planar diagrams. Nima et al indeed suggest reduction to planar ampitudes for MHV amplitudes. Matpitka@luukku.comhttp://tgdtheory.fi/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10614348.post-66763383565699851292015-03-05T01:51:41.435-08:002015-03-05T01:51:41.435-08:00In addition:
Based on such a simple object ( prop...In addition:<br /><br />Based on such a simple object ( propeller and process) oriented ontology, Black Holes could be imagined as charge splitters violating the 2e law af thermodynamics, combined with a continuous microscopic big bang plasma creation process! <br />Leo Vuyk leovuyk@gmail.comhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16285797359437018414noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10614348.post-78915751440210552132015-03-05T01:12:55.189-08:002015-03-05T01:12:55.189-08:00I think weneed lots of ontological sound speculati...I think weneed lots of ontological sound speculations about the vacuum and black holes.<br />AND I think that Stephen Hawking did not calculate with the possibility of a chiral oscillating Higgs field vacuum lattice combined with propeller shaped Fermions. Then, Electrons and positrons could both pushed away from the BH horizon at different distances, forming two charged separated spheres. With quark ( plasma) formation in between. So Black Holes could be charge splitters violating the 2e law af thermodynamics, combined with a continuous microscopic big bang plasma creation process! <br /><br />The result I try to describe :<br /><br />1: Black holes are the same as Dark Matter, they all consume photons, even gravitons and the Higgs field, but REPEL Fermions due to their propeller shape. They produce electric charged plasma.<br />2: Dark Energy is the oscillating ( Casimir) energy of the Higgs Field equipped with a tetrahedron lattice structure with variable Planck length..<br />3: Quantum Gravity = Dual Push gravity= Attraction (Higgs-Casimir opposing Graviton push).<br />4: The Big Bang is a Splitting dark matter Big Bang Black Hole (BBBH), splitting into smaller primordial BBBH Splinters forming the Fractalic Lyman Alpha forest and evaporating partly into a zero mass energetic oscillating Higgs particle based Higgs field.<br />5: Dual PBBSs hotspots, produce central plasma concentration in electric Herbig Haro systems as a base for star formation in open star clusters as a start for Spiral Galaxies. <br />6: Spiral Galaxies will keep both Primordial Dark Matter Black Holes as Galaxy Anchor Black Holes (GABHs) at long distance.<br />7: After Galaxy Merging, these GABHs are the origin of <br />Galaxy- and Magnetic field complexity and distant dwarf galaxies .<br />8: Black Holes produce Plasma direct out of the Higgs field because two Higgs particles are convertible into symmetric electron and positron (or even dual quark-) propellers (by BH horizon fluctuations).<br />9: The chirality of the (spiralling) vacuum lattice is the origin our material universe. (propeller shaped positrons merge preferentially first with gluons to form (u) Quarks to form Hydrogen.<br />10: The first Supernovas produce medium sized Black Holes as the base for secondary Herbig Haro systems and open star clusters.<br />11: ALL Dark Matter Black Holes are supposed to be CHARGE SEPARATORS with internal positive charge and an external globular shell of negative charged Quark electron plasma. <br />12: The lightspeed is related to gravity fields like the earth with long extinction distances to adapt with the solar gravity field.<br />See also: vixra.org/author/leo_vuyk<br /><br /><br />Leo Vuyk leovuyk@gmail.comhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16285797359437018414noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10614348.post-58199631175034464042015-03-03T12:24:27.527-08:002015-03-03T12:24:27.527-08:00Matti,
I am an architect focussing of Form AND Fun...Matti,<br />I am an architect focussing of Form AND Function of complex knot particles, in relation to known decay examples.<br />For the W and Z, I would suggest to look at the W an Z knots presented at figure 10, of the article I already mentioned:<br />http://vixra.org/pdf/1103.0002 <br /><br />For the quark colour differences: see figure 4 at the same article.<br />For the leptons , see: figure 3.<br /><br />Robert Finkelstein wrote an article about such knotty ideas called:<br />THE ELEMENTARY PARTICLES AS QUANTUM KNOTS IN ELECTROWEAK THEORY Robert J. Finkelstein <br />http://arxiv.org/pdf/0705.3656v1.pdfLeo Vuyk leovuyk@gmail.comhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16285797359437018414noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10614348.post-34170118297518962192015-03-01T06:01:45.469-08:002015-03-01T06:01:45.469-08:00
Hi Leo,
I wonder how you get electroweak quantum...<br />Hi Leo,<br /><br />I wonder how you get electroweak quantum numbers and quark color in this framework. Same question about flavour universality.Matpitka@luukku.comhttp://tgdtheory.fi/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10614348.post-29769774906682881492015-02-28T03:26:04.646-08:002015-02-28T03:26:04.646-08:00I would propose a different view on LeptoQuarks, ...I would propose a different view on LeptoQuarks, by a Geometrical proposal for the sub-quantum structure of 6 Leptons and all Quarks interpreted as compound Photon/Electron Positron propeller combinations. <br />Muon- and Tau particles seem to show up as family members of the Down respectivily Charm Quarks. <br />https://www.flickr.com/photos/93308747@N05/14604202116/in/photostream<br /><br />The extreme stability of the proton could be related to the complexity or binding interlocking of the d- quark ( three particles) which I did also recognize as the Muon. <br />A second reason could be the assumed symmetric geometry of the proton with the sensitive u-quark ( with only 2 interlocking particles) in the middle and sturdy d-quark at the outside. <br />See perhaps also: http://vixra.org/pdf/1103.0002 <br />Leo Vuyk leovuyk@gmail.comhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16285797359437018414noreply@blogger.com