tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10614348.post4763533786464384972..comments2024-01-22T11:26:37.599-08:00Comments on TGD diary: A general model for metabolismMatti Pitkänenhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13512912323574611883noreply@blogger.comBlogger17125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10614348.post-79864544528481415372013-11-15T12:42:16.776-08:002013-11-15T12:42:16.776-08:00http://rsif.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/10/...http://rsif.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/10/79/20120869.full An algoritm for life. Looks interesting.Ullahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16634036177244152897noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10614348.post-78034268659065631352013-11-07T03:19:45.626-08:002013-11-07T03:19:45.626-08:00Sorry that I bother you once again.
Operators are...Sorry that I bother you once again.<br /><br />Operators are used as a form of 'query' to a system note the p (momentum) =- delta ℏi due to the need for quantization - p 4 http://digitalcommons.calpoly.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi... The Quantum Mechanics of Supersymmetry<br /><br />For example, in order to calculate the kinetic energy of the system, one would apply the kinetic energy operator, notated by ^T (read “t-hat”). The object that is operated on in quantum mechanics is called the wave function, denoted by Ψ , and is a function of both position and time.<br />Ψ typically represents a particle, but it is important to note that Ψ also contains information about the environment the particle exists in. For example, a particle in free space will have a different wave function than if that same particle were in a confined box. Notice the similarity to classical mechanics where the kinetic energy T of an object with momentum p is given by the same equation without the hats. Naturally, one would reason that applying the momentum operator to a wave function should return its momentum. But this is only true if ψ satisfies a certain relationship with the momentum operator. That is, ψ must be a ‘momentum eigenstate’. Applying ^ H to the wave function returns the total energy of the system, provided that ψ is an energy eigenstate. If the Hamiltonian is written out in its complete form, the result is the familiar time-independent Schrӧdinger equation (SE) ...<br /><br />Note that ℏ is quantized here.<br /><br />This is essentially the same process as when we take 2 pi for half a circle...and 4 pi for the whole as for a harmonic oscillator? the wave function is the same if it runs in a circle?Ullahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16634036177244152897noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10614348.post-2044019978450538322013-11-06T15:26:43.165-08:002013-11-06T15:26:43.165-08:00http://phys.org/news/2013-11-theoretical-physics-s...http://phys.org/news/2013-11-theoretical-physics-sex.html<br /><br />:)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10614348.post-30000071889469396482013-10-31T20:20:00.567-07:002013-10-31T20:20:00.567-07:00Makes no sense to me;-). I do not how I could ex...Makes no sense to me;-). I do not how I could express my views about Hotson's articles in diplomatic manner;-). It is nicely written fluent prose....;-) Matti Pitkanenhttp://tgdtheory.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10614348.post-89325271824047744822013-10-31T04:54:34.293-07:002013-10-31T04:54:34.293-07:00http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0106273
"The quan...http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0106273<br />"The quantum imaginary ℏi is the contraction of a dynamical variable whose back-reaction provides the Dirac mass."Ullahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16634036177244152897noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10614348.post-74124531522153539132013-10-31T03:24:32.661-07:002013-10-31T03:24:32.661-07:00Why is there then the imaginary Plancks constant? ...Why is there then the imaginary Plancks constant? Schrödinger eguations tells explicitly it is imaginary.<br /><br />When you say that 3-surfaces also ends with string-like objects, how is then the Self reacting to that?Ullahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16634036177244152897noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10614348.post-46409194593990530112013-10-31T01:01:28.793-07:002013-10-31T01:01:28.793-07:00No: Planck constant is real. Complexity theory and...<br />No: Planck constant is real. Complexity theory and quantum mechanics are two different disciplines. Complex in the sense of complexity theory has nothing to do with the "complex" as attribute of numbers.Matti Pitkanenhttp://tgdtheory.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10614348.post-38822234394521329222013-10-30T12:59:24.518-07:002013-10-30T12:59:24.518-07:00I have seen that in Schrödinger eq. is also ih (hb...I have seen that in Schrödinger eq. is also ih (hbar) used. Is this also a way to describe complex systems? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schr%C3%B6dinger_equation<br />Does this also make the Planck constant complex?<br /><br />In fact Hotson also used the term 'complex systems' and complex numbers for these things, alternately.Ullahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16634036177244152897noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10614348.post-36297515232985785172013-10-29T07:01:03.770-07:002013-10-29T07:01:03.770-07:00I am not sure what imaginary time means here.
Haw...<br />I am not sure what imaginary time means here. <br />Hawking uses effectively imaginary time in an attempt to define path integrals as analytical continuations of functional integrals in general relativity. One calculates in Euclidian signature ("imaginary time"), where things are not so ill-defined and returns to Minkowskian. This is just trickery used also in quantum field theories.<br /><br />In TGD framework Euclidian signature of space-time region is associated with the space-time surfaces representing particles - "lines" of generalized Feynman diagrams. Euclidian signature is completely real physically: also black hole interiors are replaced with Euclidian regions. <br /><br />I would not however use the word "imaginary time" since it is un-necessary and misleading as also the notion of imaginary dimension. One can just speak of complex structure. Ordinary plane and any 2-D object possesses complex structure but one does not speak of imaginary space-dimension. <br /><br />By conformal invariance one can choose complex coordinates in infinite number of manners and one can assign imaginary/real dimension to the conformal image of lines parallel to y-axis/x-axis of plane so that the notion is not conformal invariant.<br /><br /><br />Matti Pitkanenhttp://tgdtheory.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10614348.post-23224740591446226302013-10-29T00:50:23.327-07:002013-10-29T00:50:23.327-07:00Hawking also use imaginary time.
Hotson arrived at...Hawking also use imaginary time.<br />Hotson arrived at 10 D 4+6. I think he used 3D for time, but is that really necessary? I have met the 3D time also in hidden 6+xD theories. <br /><br />The imaginary units can be linked to octonions, but they are so tiny... But maybe in a nanoworld the tinyness is not of so big problem. Can it be because of an unquantized Planck constant (seen as a 3 surface, as a relation) because Planck time is a minimum distance? This also means that our world as we see it is quantized (angular momentum) and there is also the possibility of the hierarchies in form of CD-diamonds...<br /><br />Another interpretation of his imaginary dimensions must then be virtual dimensions, but how that is done in math, I cannot say. The virtual dimensions must be an (e)m-effect and come in right angles? What does it tell about the quantization of Plancks constant?<br /><br />This view also would be an entrance to the 'magnetic bodies'?<br /><br />Does this at all make sense to you? I must ask, because there is a very messy world out there, so full of misinformation and fantasies :)<br />Ullahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16634036177244152897noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10614348.post-70441838300509309392013-10-28T11:28:53.938-07:002013-10-28T11:28:53.938-07:00Well, sometimes we must step back to see forward.....Well, sometimes we must step back to see forward...Ullahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16634036177244152897noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10614348.post-46102129620321436382013-10-28T08:51:20.306-07:002013-10-28T08:51:20.306-07:00Not my thoughts this time;-)!
I have seen Hotson...<br />Not my thoughts this time;-)! <br /><br />I have seen Hotson's article earlier. Hotson challenges existing views, in particular about the sign of energy. This is quite ok. <br /><br />The interpretation of Dirac equation and bringing in ether as Hotson does, leads however nowhere. <br />Hotson also confuses negative roots (negative frequency modes for modes for Dirac equation) with imaginary unit and suggests imaginary time, and ends up with complete mathematical nonsense. Theoretical physics cannot be done without proper mathematical tools. Again and again reading this kind of articles teaches this.<br /><br />In quantum field theory Dirac equation is perfectly understood. The real challenges relate to the idealization of particles with point like particles. String models replaced point like particles with strings. It was not enough. In TGD they are replaced with 3-D surfaces and also now string like objects emerge naturally but are not the whole truth. This is the path to follow, not return to thirties and even to the ether physics of the eighteenth century.<br /> <br /><br />Matti Pitkanenhttp://tgdtheory.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10614348.post-8874899675460768472013-10-27T11:23:23.437-07:002013-10-27T11:23:23.437-07:00Have you read the papers of Don Hotson, 3 papers? ...Have you read the papers of Don Hotson, 3 papers? He has a somewhat linked view of what is dark matter, using imaginary dimensions coming from a topology. <br />http://openseti.org/Docs/HotsonPart1.pdf<br />change the 1 to a 2 for part 2.<br />http://www.scribd.com/doc/58324936/Dirac-s-Equation-and-the-Sea-of-Negative-Energy-Part-3-by-D-L-Hotson<br /><br />Some deep thoughts of yours again :)Ullahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16634036177244152897noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10614348.post-54640294449940726242013-10-26T07:31:49.467-07:002013-10-26T07:31:49.467-07:00
Theoreticians are irrational in their rationality...<br />Theoreticians are irrational in their rationality. One and same person refuses to believe that the recent physics might not explain everything but is ready to believe that space-time is brane in 11-D space and that physics cannot predict anything without anthropic principle. Sociological factors determine our beliefs. <br /><br />As a matter of fact, the great experiences came later than the basic idea of TGD. Great experiences forced destroyed once and for all my belief in reductionistic and materialistic dogmas and stimulated interest on consciousness and eventually led to TGD inspired theory of consciousness.<br />Matti Pitkanenhttp://tgdtheory.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10614348.post-65089956033211823432013-10-26T05:27:11.413-07:002013-10-26T05:27:11.413-07:00I archived your earlier papers on UFOs as Plasmoid...I archived your earlier papers on UFOs as Plasmoids and the Arecibo crop circle at http://www.stealthskater.com/Pitkanen.htm#Plasmoids . There is also mention of "plasmoids" by other authors at http://www.stealthskater.com/UFO.htm#Plasmoids .<br /><br />It is interesting to note that while most physicists discount the possibility of alien civilizations navigating to Earth, they do seem fascinated by the idea that these might be "time machines" as in quantum teleportation or messages from the Future. Perhaps along the same lines as your 'Two Great Personal Great Experiences' which led to your discovery of TGD (http://www.stealthskater.com/Pitkanen.htm#Bio )???K.R.A.M.http://www.stealthskater.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10614348.post-34848463091655769362013-10-25T20:11:52.939-07:002013-10-25T20:11:52.939-07:00I try to define what I mean with dark matter prac...<br />I try to define what I mean with dark matter practically every time I use it. The motivations for "dark" are obvious and I also try to make clear the differences with respect to standard identifications. <br /><br />Concerning p-adics: sqr(t) and sqrt(5) and more general algebraic numbers appearing in p-adic length scales could emerge naturally for algebraic extensions via canonical identification mapping algebraic extensions of p-adics to reals. <br /><br />If Fermat primes define a hierarchy of preferred multiples of Planck constant, one obtains them for both dark and p-adic hierarchies. The "resonance" between identical p-adic length scales and dark scales would be basic aspect of liberation of energy in metabolism.<br /><br />Crop circles is of course something which instantaneously transforms academic colleague enjoying monthly salary to an animal like state in deep rage;-). Is it fun to tease academic colleagues or why I doing this to these innocent creatures?;-) <br /><br /><br /><br /><br />Matti Pitkanenhttp://tgdtheory.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10614348.post-75205180623145263762013-10-24T16:46:31.241-07:002013-10-24T16:46:31.241-07:00Hey, Matti
I see you have been busy with some dee...Hey, Matti<br /><br />I see you have been busy with some deep thinking. There is a problem with how you use the term dark -x and I and others use it. This sort of mirror thing may be well, ghostly obscure but I feel you constrained by the old terminology while accessing a wider physics. It is sort of like the supersymmetric partners that sustains the standard theory, that is it is with such dark photons and so on... I too applied black holes and string theory to the genetics but it was too late for a friend with terminal brain cancer but it is cleaver to relate all this to metabolism and cold fusion products. But is p-adics in your question of other roots like 3 or 5 a new idea for you? You will understand quasics this way but I know now we are in different directions to which my questions were not directly in the same area as you even if we had shared terminology. Of course the mentioning of some things will put off the establishment science- crop circles, even I had to look a little deeper beyond this. I do not think cold fusion just explainable as possible by quantum ideas, it must go deeper. <br /><br />I added a core speculation in my blogspot at these hinted at foundations and in the end as a review added the 256 coordinate system (the quason) and as you speculated on 16 precursor dna-rna as an alternative to methylation effects, although that idea has been well known but controversial, I posted some of it in response to Gong on the viXra blog. You and I are different in that some open questions on this I no longer need to ask... I thought p-adics would be much more powerful. It will be quite interesting to see what you find further along your own paths of inquiry.L. Edgar Ottohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00525169618204198073noreply@blogger.com