tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10614348.post4867674417387637845..comments2023-01-19T00:50:01.428-08:00Comments on TGD diary: Manifest unitarity and information loss in gravitational collapseMatti Pitkänenhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13512912323574611883noreply@blogger.comBlogger13125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10614348.post-23811073335740017262015-04-22T04:03:25.470-07:002015-04-22T04:03:25.470-07:00Yeah, physics and theory formulation is a game tha...Yeah, physics and theory formulation is a game that you play without knowing the rules, and the purpose of the game is to find the rules of the game you play. In that sense it can be a win-win game. Of course, the Rule-Maker / Game-Master can be Heyoka-like joker, that gives the player a new and even more complex game to play if and when the rules have been found (cf. Newton->Einstein->Quantum->Unified->etc.). Human brain is hunting weapon that likes challenges...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10614348.post-58805132907767779122015-04-21T20:36:02.078-07:002015-04-21T20:36:02.078-07:00
The basic objects consists of objects, now (L,R) ...<br />The basic objects consists of objects, now (L,R) pairs.<br />This sounds very fractal. Probably this aspect been considered. Matpitka@luukku.comhttp://tgdtheory.fi/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10614348.post-35770189504556432722015-04-21T19:32:20.530-07:002015-04-21T19:32:20.530-07:00Yes, Go has very simple rules, and includes also a...Yes, Go has very simple rules, and includes also a version of no-cloning theorem, but as said, surreal numbers did not arise from the rules of Go, but from the calculations for a winning end-game strategy in terms of win-lose game. Metabolic creatures like to have tummy full, and human brain is a mighty hunting weapon. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10614348.post-45574484829679539812015-04-21T06:12:30.607-07:002015-04-21T06:12:30.607-07:00
To Anonymous:
Amazing that a model for games, s...<br />To Anonymous: <br /><br />Amazing that a model for games, something which is very finite, leads to surreal numbers! Games look like non-Archimedean variant of surreal numbers. <br /><br />It is a pity that I do not have the rules for constructing surreals in spin.<br /><br />I however wonder whether there could be a connection between infinite primes (integers/rationals), adeles, and these mysterious games. Infinite primes are finite in any p-adic norm and the norm is one.<br />Matpitka@luukku.comhttp://tgdtheory.fi/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10614348.post-60961031949844290132015-04-20T06:20:00.005-07:002015-04-20T06:20:00.005-07:00Link didn't work.
Anyhow, the basic philosop...Link didn't work. <br /><br />Anyhow, the basic philosophy is becoming clearer: trinity of two entangled complementary pairs: finite-infinite and infinitesimal-infinitely large. <br /><br />That trinity brings to mind theory of games that is more general than surreal numbers, go is based on very simple rules, but when you bring in intention of winning the game (controlling more area than opponent in Archimedean sense), the psychological aspect generates theory of non-Archimedean surreal numbers: http://scienceblogs.com/goodmath/2007/04/01/post-3/<br /><br />Even more generally, win-lose games are just a subset of more general anatomy of social games: win-win, lose-lose and lose-win. And whether we speak about representative dictatorship of majority, nation state competition for finite resources, nuclear MAD, theories competing for social acceptance etc. win-lose games, they are much more like lose-lose games than win-win games.<br /><br />So, what if we apply win-win games as the conscious ethical constraint on playing games of number theories, definitions of (neg)entropy etc. theory formulation?<br /> Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10614348.post-72602406776858328512015-04-19T20:00:45.856-07:002015-04-19T20:00:45.856-07:00I have written a TGD inspired commentary of Eleme...<br />I have written a TGD inspired commentary of Elemer Rosinger's idea about extension of reals compared to the hierarchy of infinite primes. See http://tgdtheory.fi/pubic_html/tgdnumber/tgdnumber.html#infsur .Matpitka@luukku.comhttp://tgdtheory.fi/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10614348.post-64928403017708461242015-04-19T18:20:40.986-07:002015-04-19T18:20:40.986-07:00And this:
http://earthweareone.com/alien-message-t...And this:<br />http://earthweareone.com/alien-message-to-mankind-do-you-wish-that-we-show-up/<br /><br />https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uj-kHy5b5moAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10614348.post-85096869809729426242015-04-19T17:53:26.176-07:002015-04-19T17:53:26.176-07:00Social Construction of Reality also this:
Surpris...Social Construction of Reality also this:<br /><br />Surprising Properties of Non-Archimedean Field Extensions of the<br />Real Numbers<br />http://arxiv.org/pdf/0911.4824v2.pdfAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10614348.post-28456688849639967082015-04-16T23:26:13.483-07:002015-04-16T23:26:13.483-07:00The Social Construction of Reality
"The Socia...The Social Construction of Reality<br />"The Social Construction of Reality" on @Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Social_Construction_of_Reality?source=app<br /><br />*grabs the popcorn*<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10614348.post-36037673800173438902015-04-16T20:16:51.289-07:002015-04-16T20:16:51.289-07:00
To Anonymous,
Maldacena, Susskind and other ar...<br />To Anonymous, <br /><br /><br />Maldacena, Susskind and other are following TGD in that they suggests that wormholes as long tube like structures connecting distant space-time regions (blackholes) are correlates for entanglement.<br /><br />In TGD situation is however in many respects different although the gurus have caught the basic idea of TGD correctly: entanglement has topological space-time correlates. They have still to discover that also particles<br />have these correlates and that Feynman diagrammatic has space-tme correlates. The traffic in Research Gate suggests that these discoveries will be made soon;-) <br /><br />Colleagues of course cannot suddenly start to talk about many-sheeted space-time and must transform the ideas to the language of GRT. This is only mimicry but the best they can achieve. <br /><br /><br />There are many new elements<br /><br />*Instead of tube like wormholes magnetic flux tubes and associated fermionic strings serve as correlates for entanglement and are responsible for the formation of gravitational bound states. <br />* Another new element is two- sheetednes of basic structures: always two sheets connected by wormhole contacts are involved and <br />flux tubes carry monopole charged needed to stabilise wormhole contacts. And always pairs of wormhole contacts. <br />*Third new element is large h_eff =n*h =h_gr making possible quantum gravitational binding and astroscopic quantum coherence. <br />Fourth new element are huge generalised conformal symmetries and the breaking hierarchy for them (hierarchy of quantum criticalities).<br />*Fifth new element is negentropic entanglement: state function reduction can take place to a n-D subspace such that density matrix is n-D projector. And of course Negentropy Maximization Principle is there too.<br />*Sixth new element. In TGD wormholes are associated with wormhole contacts, which have short dimension in CP_2 directions (CP_2 size- 10^4 Planck lengths) . The can have arbitrary large M^4 projection. What is new that they have Euclidian induced metric and they serve as space-time sheets assignable to physical objects of their size. They replace blakcholes. These wormhole contacts the wormhole tubes of GRT along which the spaceships travel in science fiction. One can forget space-time travel now.<br />* Seventh new element. In TGD *gravitational binding* is mediated by fermion carrying strings and flux tubes connecting partonic 2-surfaces. It would be exaggeration to say that gravitation emerges from entanglement. Also here gurus are transforming TGD based ideas to GRT framework. <br /><br />The problem is that the hegemony deso not have any theory and are used to express these ideas - even the idea about emergent gravity - using notions like blackhole which are outcome from a theory of gravity. Things would become simple by accepting TGD as starting point but this is not possible until the proponents….. as Bohr said;-).<br />Matpitka@luukku.comhttp://tgdtheory.fi/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10614348.post-63570004047615269862015-04-16T15:37:52.652-07:002015-04-16T15:37:52.652-07:00Nice link, Ulla. Lenny seems to be looking for qua...Nice link, Ulla. Lenny seems to be looking for quantum gravity in terms of entanglement:<br /><br />“When the black holes were entangled, then pulled apart, the theorists found that what emerged was a wormhole — a tunnel through space-time that is thought to be held together by gravity. The idea seemed to suggest that, in the case of wormholes, gravity emerges from the more fundamental phenomenon of entangled black holes,”<br />http://www.universetoday.com/106968/could-particle-spooky-action-define-the-nature-of-gravity/<br /><br />What does TGD predict about entropic and/or negentropic entanglement as(?)<br />quantum gravity and is it possible to derive GRT, or what is relevant and worth keeping in GRT, from such idea?<br /><br />Should we start from idea that "nonlocal" (different hbar values) universal entangled unity = universal gravity field, and local non-entangled phenomena are context dependent measurement exceptions to this state? What about the "monogamy" coupling of entangled states that was derived? How is that rule derived, and does it hold only for entropic entanglement? Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10614348.post-69977555450634536472015-04-14T20:32:39.786-07:002015-04-14T20:32:39.786-07:00Thank you. I hope that I find time to listen. Thank you. I hope that I find time to listen. Matpitka@luukku.comhttp://tgdtheory.fi/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10614348.post-27101428011485786262015-04-14T01:23:14.797-07:002015-04-14T01:23:14.797-07:00https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yMRYZMv0jRE&fe...https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yMRYZMv0jRE&feature=youtu.be<br /><br />See how he describes the hierarchy between subworlds as a 'jump' between BH horisons...<br />and not a word of other dimensions, nor strings...Ullahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16634036177244152897noreply@blogger.com