tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10614348.post818988243861281031..comments2024-01-22T11:26:37.599-08:00Comments on TGD diary: Why the non-trivial zeros of Riemann zeta should reside at critical line?Matti Pitkänenhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13512912323574611883noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10614348.post-47005201999246528762015-11-27T14:37:23.780-08:002015-11-27T14:37:23.780-08:00"By strong form of holography only very few d..."By strong form of holography only very few deformations are allowed since they must respect the vanishing of the elements of a sub-algebra of the classical symplectic charges isomorphic with the entire algebra. One has almost 2-dimensionality: most deformations lead outside WCW and have zero norm in WCW metric."<br /><br />See the creation of WCW :)<br />https://youtu.be/RDXpHj8ArNs<br />- You see the 'jumps', it is not smooth as in GR<br />- At 0,32 y see a reorganisation/selforganization to some very big structures, starting from 0,31. The same again at 1,12. a very skewed arrangemang. At 1,15 and 1,16 also skewed. <br />- at 1,21, asymmetry, before the big eruptions or the 'jumps'/quantizations start (creation of WCW).<br /> Skewness comes from rotation of holographic longranged worldsheets at least 2 of them against each other, in opposite directions. In between those branes or sheets things start to happen...transverse wormholes or black/white holes (?) and longrange waves (electron, graviton?) bounded by magnetic extremals (:) ) so we see our WCW in some illusionistic, fisheye view, as something very important, when it is marginal. This the almost Euclidean universe tells something about?<br /><br />compare https://nige.wordpress.com/2007/06/20/the-mathematical-errors-in-the-standard-model-of-particle-physics/<br />Hope y get some of this.<br />Ullahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16634036177244152897noreply@blogger.com