Thursday, November 18, 2010

What might be the origin of Fermi bubbles?

Fermi-LAT satellite has product new interesting data about Milky Way central region commented already by Lubos. The following is the abstract of the article Giant Gamma-ray Bubbles from Fermi-LAT: AGN Activity or Bipolar Galactic Wind? by Meng Su, Tracy R. Slatyer and Douglas P. Finkbeiner.

Data from the Fermi-LAT reveal two large gamma-ray bubbles, extending 50 degrees above and below the Galactic center, with a width of about 40 degrees in longitude. The gamma-ray emission associated with these bubbles has a significantly harder spectrum (dN/dE ≈&E-2) than the IC emission from electrons in the Galactic disk, or the gamma-rays produced by decay of pions from proton-ISM collisions. There is no significant spatial variation in the spectrum or gamma-ray intensity within the bubbles, or between the north and south bubbles. The bubbles are spatially correlated with the hard-spectrum microwave excess known as the WMAP haze; the edges of the bubbles also line up with features in the ROSAT X-ray maps at 1.5-2 keV. We argue that these Galactic gamma-ray bubbles were most likely created by some large episode of energy injection in the Galactic center, such as past accretion events onto the central massive black hole, or a nuclear starburst in the last ≈&10 Myr. Dark matter annihilation/decay seems unlikely to generate all the features of the bubbles and the associated signals in WMAP and ROSAT; the bubbles must be understood in order to use measurements of the diffuse gamma-ray emission in the inner Galaxy as a probe of dark matter physics. Study of the origin and evolution of the bubbles also has the potential to improve our understanding of recent energetic events in the inner Galaxy and the high-latitude cosmic ray population.

The article contains a long highly technical description of findings. I of course do not have real understanding about this side. The results however seem to be rather clear. There is bubble and its mirror image (bringing in the mind of Lubos infinity symbol) with a center in the galactic nucleus. In these regions there is no significang spatial variation of the gamma ray intensity. The radius of the bubbles is about 5 kparsecs. The X-ray maps in energy range 1.5-2 keV suggest features consistent with the identification as Fermi bubbles. Also the WMAP microwave excess known as microwave haze is consistent with Fermi bubbles.

What could be the mechanism producing the gamma rays?

  1. I do not regard the explanation in terms of a catastrophic event terribly convincing since I find it difficult to understand the symmetry with respect to the galactic plane for this option. Rather, the notion of many-sheeted space-time would suggest that quasi-static structures are involved.

  2. Fractality of TGD Universe would encourage to consider analogies with the physics of stellar objects, maybe even planets. The nearest and best known example is Earth itself with its magnetic fields and associated van Allen radiation belts. Could Fermi bubbles correspond to a dipole magnetic field with dipole in the direction of galactic plane? Could the dipole correspond to the galactic bar? The estimates for its size vary in surprisingly large range of 1-5 kparsecs but are reasonably near to the size scales of the bubbles which is around 10 kparsecs.

  3. One could perhaps imagine the analogs of van Allen radiation belts with very energetic particles originating from the galactic bar a nd traveling along flux quanta (back and forth?) and radiating gamma rays, whose energies would vary up to 100 GeV at least. In the magnetohydrodynamic approximation the charged particles would move along the field lines of the magnetic field. There is however energy conserving Lorentz force present (plus possibly the Coulomb force caused by electric field) and this causes the emission of radiation.

  4. In TGD framework the decay of string like object defined by bar could generate extremely energetic particles -say electrons- propagating along the flux quanta. The emission of gamma rays would be especially intensive near turning points where the direction of motion of charged particle is changing most intensely. This would occur near galactic plane where the direction of the magnetic field is changing.

One could bring more TGD to this picture.

  1. In TGD vision galaxies are like pearls in the necklace represented by long cosmic strings. These cosmic strings are not the cosmic strings are in GUTs but string like 3-surfaces predicted by TGD dominating the very early cosmolgy and gradually developing an increasing size for their Minkowski space projection with in the ideal case is 2-D. These cosmic strings would be responsible for the magnetic fields filling the Universe but very poorly understood in the standard cosmology. The jet orthogonal to the plane of galaxy would be associated with the "big cosmic string" defining the necklace.

  2. Also the galaxies themselves could correspond to decay producs of cosmic strings. They could be closed or open: maybe the two cases correspond to elliptic and spiral galaxies. The galactic bar for spiral galaxies could correspond to decay products of open cosmic string. A straight cosmic string with length L corresponds to an object with mass which is roughly 10-4 times the mass of black hole with radius L. If the cosmic string is highly entangled, its mass can approach to that of black hole and supermassive galactic black hole with a size of about 150 light seconds could correspond to a highly entangled piece of cosmic string.

  3. Open cosmic strings could decay to ordinary matter at their ends. During quasar phase this process would be especially effective and could be partially responsible for gamma ray beams in the direction of the string and producing gamma ray bursts. Kind of cosmic fire crackers would be in question and galactic bar could represent remnants of this kind of fire-cracker still emitting matter travelling along the flux quanta of the galactic magnetic field and producing the gamma radiation.

  4. There should be strong magnetic fields associated with these objects. In TGD Universe they would correspond to space-time sheets defining flux tubes or flux sheets of magnetic field. Charged particles would travel along these flux sheets and dissipate their energy by emitting gamma rays.

An interesting question is whether it makes sense to speak about cyclotron states at the flux tubes of the magnetic field and assign the X rays or microwaves with the cyclotron emission.

  1. The d'Alembertian for a relativistic motion in constant magnetic field reduces to free motion in longitudinal direction and harmonic oscillator in the transversal directions. By generalizing the non-relativistic formula one one obtain the dispersion relation

    E = (p2+2n × h× eB)1/2 .

    Here p is the momentum parallel to the flux tube. The magnetic contribution to the energy is completely neglibible in gamma ray range unless magnetic field is very strong.

  2. The unit of transversal magnetic energy corresponding to Δ n=1 in the formula for the energy is h× eB/E obtained by replacing mass with energy in the classical formula. For relativistic energies these energies form a continuum. Magnetic confinement suggests that the value of the galactic magnetic field should be such that the transversal contribution to the energy is comparable to the longitudinal energy. For magnetic field of 1 Tesla L= sqrt(h/eB) corresponds to magnetic length of order nm which corresponds to energy of order 102 eV. For ordinary value of Planck constant 100 GeV would require a magnetic field with magnitude of order 109 Tesla. 108 Tesla is the value of B assigned with typical pulsars but there is also a class of pulsars with 1000 stronger magnetic field. One might expect magnetic fields with at strength of at least 108 Tesla in the galactic nucleus.

  3. How the scaling of scaling of Planck constant for dark matter affects the situation? Large values of Planck constant correspond to integer multiples h=nh0 of ordinary Planck constants and coverings of the imbedding space. This would suggest that the total magnetic flux remains constant and is only divided between N sheets so that the formula for the energy is unaffected for a given sheet of the covering.

9 Comments:

At 12:13 AM, Blogger Ulla said...

I knew it would interest you. This is the best ever situation to proove dark matter. They try to explain it with electrons but also say they are not enough.
If you look back at what has been discovered at other galaxies and black holes you see a clear line of evidence.
The problem is what happens to antimatter, if Graham is right. It just disappear. Where? To the past. But how? Time for the Planck constant change?

I have no time to read it now. Good.

 
At 8:50 AM, Blogger Ulla said...

This one is interesting, look at the pictures.
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/1011/1011.1925v1.pdf


Blueshifted stars (BHB) are concentrated around the galactic center. The coordinate system has its origin at the Galactic center, composed of all stars (left-hand and right-hand panels) simultaneously. The upper right-hand panel shows the line-of-sight velocity distribution as a function of distance from the Sun d, while the lower right-hand panel is the cumulative distribution of BHB stars with distance from the Galactic center.

http://rst.gsfc.nasa.gov/Sect20/visualization.jpg
http://rst.gsfc.nasa.gov/Sect20/A3.html

An unusual distribution of Gamma Ray energy, shown in this figure as the red glow above the Milky Way plane. It has been interpreted as a region in which antimatter (electrons are positively charged [positrons] and protons have a negative charge.) has interacted with conventional matter, releasing a huge amount of energy.

http://zone-reflex.blogspot.com/2010/11/more-about-galactic-tornados.html

 
At 11:25 AM, Blogger Ulla said...

http://www.science20.com/news_releases/antimatter_cloud_traced_to_binary_stars
Antimatter Cloud Traced To Binary Stars
...one of the most vexing mysteries in our Milky Way: the origin of a giant cloud of antimatter surrounding the galactic center.
This imbalance matches the distribution of a population of binary star systems that contain black holes or neutron stars, strongly suggesting that these binaries are churning out at least half of the antimatter, and perhaps all of it.

So, my question is: Why do they NOT talk of this?

 
At 8:27 PM, Blogger Matti Pitkanen said...

Ulla said:

"http://www.science20.com/news_releases/antimatter_cloud_traced_to_binary_stars
Antimatter Cloud Traced To Binary Stars
...one of the most vexing mysteries in our Milky Way: the origin of a giant cloud of antimatter surrounding the galactic center. ...."

I am not sure that the observations require a giant cloud of antimatter surrounding galactic center. The gamma rays at energy about .5 MeV are proposed to result in annilations of electrons and positrons or in annihilation of dark matter particles.

TGD based explanation is in terms of decays of electropions produced in strong electric and magnetic fields which are not orthogonal. Electropions could have large Planck constant and would thus be dark in TGD sense.

TGD actually assigns leptohadron physics with all lepton generations and the evidence is acculumating. I wrote about this some time ago.

The claim that leptons can have colored excitations is an idea which colleagues refuse to even consider irrespective of whether it works or not. The reason is that it is in complete conflict with the prevailing GUT religion and if correct would mean that particle physics theorist community has been on wrong track for the last 40 years. Too much for any ego;-)!

A long and painful hangover is waiting theoretical physicists: a lot of GUTs combined with a large dose of M-theory is a killer combination! The return to reality is however unavoidable and I can only express my commiseration;-).

 
At 3:01 AM, Blogger Ulla said...

I found this beauty. http://telescoper.wordpress.com/2010/11/18/at-it/

I think he sits at that strange table
of Eddington’s. That is not a table
at all, but nodes and molecules
pushing against molecules
and nodes; and he writes there
in invisible handwriting the instructions
the genes follow. I imagine his
face that is more the face
of a clock, and the time told by it
is now, though Greece is referred
to and Egypt and empires
not yet begun.

And I would have
things to say to this God
at the judgement, storming at him,
as Job stormed with the eloquence
of the abused heart. But there will
be no judgement other than the verdict
of his calculations, that abstruse
geometry that proceeds eternally
in the silence beyond right and wrong.

 
At 9:35 AM, Blogger Doug said...

Hi Matti,

From a math / geometry perspective, the proposed bubbles seem to resemble a torus (double) bubble. This is viewable on google images.

 
At 6:29 PM, Blogger Matti Pitkanen said...

To Ulla: Beautiful poem and would make me pessimistic unless I knew that this eternal geometry beyond right and wrong can be replaced with a new one in each moment of re-creation and that we are the re-creators.

Doug: I see double bubble and assign it with the geometry of field lines of dipole magnetic field with dipole in galactic plane (the galactic bar). I did not understand how to assign with it a torus.

 
At 12:01 AM, Blogger Ulla said...

And we can change the past, and also forgive and forget and begin all over. A new fractal.

The helix is a solenoid.

 
At 6:16 AM, Blogger Ulla said...

I have made a story, http://zone-reflex.blogspot.com/2010/12/could-antimatter-be-missing-darkmatter.html

But if it fits here?

 

Post a Comment

<< Home