There are however long standing objections against the bioharmony model. In particular, the model predicts 12-note scale and complex bio-harmonies with 64 3-chords but does it allow us to understand the simplest major and minor scales and corresponding 3-chords?
- Quint cycle modulo octave equivalence gives the notes of 12-note scale. This scale can be deformed to well-tempered scales in which notes correspond to powers of 21/12 modulo octave equivalence. The cycle FCGDAEH gives the notes of the major scale. 3 + 1/2 octaves are involved. Note that the quint cycle spans the note-scale of classical guitar. Also the minor scale is obtained. What remains missing are the altered notes F# and G#.
Interestingly, the recent findings about animal communications containing frequency range .5 Hz -4 Hz and also higher frequencies are consistent with the range of 3 and 1/2 octaves (see this).
If the quint cycle is continued, notes which do not belong to the basic scale appear and eventually give the 12-note scale. One can say that the standard scale emerges naturally.
- What about the icosahedral 3-chords assuming a quint cycle? The edges of a face (triangle) contained in the Hamilton cycle correspond to quints. The number of quints per triangle is n=0,1,2. 3 quints would mean that the cycle intersects itself. Also triangles sharing no edges with the Hamilton cycle are possible.
The problem is that the icosahedral part of the bioharmony does not contain in a natural way major and minor chords containing minor third (e.g. CEG and ACE).
- For the first option the tetrahedron does not share faces with the icosahedron and the tetrahedral Hamilton cycle is closed and corresponds to an octave. The simplest assumption is that the edges of the cycle correspond to minor thirds but one can also consider other options. 2 edges do not belong to the cycle. The notes of the 4-note cycle starting from A correspond to ACEbF#A. This does not allow chords containing minor third and major third.
It seems that one must give up the ACEbF#A scale. The tetrahedral cycle CGEAC however satisfies the constraints: the faces contain quint CG, major third CE, and minor thirds AC and EG. The 4 tetrahedral chords are CEG(major), ACE (minor), and AGC and EAG.
- During years I have considered many proposals for how the icosahedral and tetrahedral harmonies could be fused together. Tetrahedron has only a single Hamilton cycle. The notion of key is however essential when the scale is not the full 12-note scale, especially so when no modified notes are involved. The key distinguishes between different tetrahedral harmonies differing by transposition. The key for the tetrahedral chords could be determined by assigning the tetrahedron to a single note of icosahedral 12-note scale. Does this have a geometric interpretation? For instance, do the icosahedron and tetrahedron share a single vertex? This would allow 64 chords.
For a summary of earlier postings see Latest progress in TGD.
For the lists of articles (most of them published in journals founded by Huping Hu) and books about TGD see this.