For the change of the arrow of time the recent findings gave direct support in atomic scales (see this). Effectively there is a deterministic process leading to the final state of reduction. This is an illusion: reduction produces superposition of deterministic classical time evolutions beginning from the final state but backwards in time of observer. Experimenters misinterpreted this as time evolution with standard arrow of time leading to the final state of reduction.
Also Libet's findings about active aspects of consciousness can be interpreted in ZEO along the same lines. The observation that the neural activity begins before conscious decision can be understood by saying that the act of free will as a big state function reduction changed the arrow of time for an appropriate subsystem of the system studied. Tte time reversed classical evolutions from the outcome of the volitional action were interpreted erratically as a time evolution leading to the conscious decision. A less precise manner to say this is that conscious decision (big state function reduction) sent a classical signal to geometric past with opposite arrow of time initiating neural activity. Libet's finding led physicalistic neuroscientists to conclude that free will is an illusion. The actual illusions were physicalism and the belief that arrow of time is always the same.
See the article Copenhagen interpretation dead: long live ZEO based quantum measurement theory! or the chapter Life and Death and Consciousness of "TGD based view about living matter and remote mental interactions: Part I".
For a summary of earlier postings see Latest progress in TGD.
5 comments:
Libet's finding led physicalistic neuroscientists to conclude that free will is an illusion.
I dont Think so. Libet always proposed that the ability to VETO An act is the real deal for our free will. !! See:
http://vixra.org/pdf/1704.0003v1.pdf
my suggestion;
God Seems to Play Dice with Dual Entangled Pinball Machines in a Supersymmetric (Susy) Multiverse
http://vixra.org/pdf/1608.0329v2.p
In addition, see: "The Conscious Readiness Potential Ratio Multiverse"
The Benjamin Libet discovery of two different Readiness Potentials (RPI and RPII) and the potential to VETO an act, is reason to suggest the presence of a SuSy multiverse with entanglement down to each quantum.
However, Libet did not Notice, because he (or his successors) did not measure the ratio between RPI and RPII , as a base for the total number of SuSy Universes.
see: https://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/2019/07/the-conscious-readiness-potential-ratio.html
The Observer- Subject-Object relation of the Copenhagen interpretation reinvented, without half dead/living Cats and leading to an Entangled Multiverse with 8 or 12 entangled universes.
see: "The Conscious Readiness Potential Ratio Multiverse"
http://vixra.org/pdf/1907.0250v2.pdf
The Benjamin Libet discovery of two different Readiness Potentials (RPI and RPII) .
Libet did not Notice, because he did not measure the ratio between RPI and RPII , as a base for the MWI
Conclusion: there are always more observers (80%) RPII, to follow -by entanglement at universal distances- the initiative of RPI = observed (<20%).
MWI explained by Neuroscience ?
Benjamin Libet found the entangled 8 or12 fold Entangled Raspberry Multiverse already in 1983, by his RPI-RPII splitting measurements combined with a 20-80% splitting found later by Trevena and Miller.
see: https://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/2019/07/the-copenhagen-interpretation.html
Post a Comment