For background and details see the chapter Homeopathy in Many-Sheeted Space-time or the article "Applied biophysics of activated water" and the basic mechanism of water memory in TGD framework".
Saturday, June 08, 2013
Biophysics of activated water and the mechanism of water memory
Applied Biophysics of Activated Water by Vysotskii et al gives a nice summary about the experiments carried out by using what they call activated water. One can say that the experiments provide a strong support for the notion of water memory. In the following I present a short summary about the contents of the book with associations to TGD inspired view about water memory and homeopathy. What comes as a surprise is the extreme simplicity of the basic mechanism of water memory and also the profound implications of this mechanism for the evolution.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
27 comments:
I think it is clear in general that we have a sense of unity that begins to describe consciousness as some kind of structural system. And it is complex and dynamic. I do not think of it as just an emerging phenomenon- emerging to what and to where? But I am concerned with things more foundational than the quantum regime and depth of physical reality as uniqueness.
The shared principle of converging evolving toward the best or ideal among systems (such as life in a solar system or galaxy arising in some local chance configuration) as a unifying self referntial system is pretty much an understood principle in one form or another in our physics in some parallel form (for yes conscious is at least a system and one moreover from my view and experience seems almost a model I can hold in my hand and understand in the abstract viewing)
The other principle you suggest here is the supersymmetry 101 as in the simple Don Lincoln's video on it from Fermi lab... or what I called the four way dialectic... four space in a sense but that only the beginning beyond say octonions in physics as I understand such higher abstract realms is that which p-adic spaces touch and explore.
Application of such systems say to things like "water memory" of we can touch or imagine them seem half distant in a vague context of such certainties we feel and feel as uniquely our own and stand toward as a center of awareness convinced of our theories of everything.
In this sense the phenomenon of the conscious system as physics we here address and explore as if half material or potential as energetic, an abstract theory of nothingness- is of the same model description as of the Higgs.
Where do you think TGD may go or lead us from here? I am sure your vision is sound and strong, in it secure enough to stand on its own outside of challenges of others and the main stream. But how or by what mechanism (of things just outside experiment) can we convey the consciousness of this description as a phenomenon if someone else has to be in the phenomenon of awareness or consciousness of it?
In these deeper realms I come across papers on line and recently that do not seem to form simple ideas say of transfinite number embedded spaces in our consciousness like structures that
generalizes things to the other levels of differentiation (save the number of curves in a plane or brane on the second level). Our consciousness is wider in such abstractions and principles hidden in abstraction...
This girl has some interesting thoughts.. I wonder what she thinks of all this spacetime nonsense
http://www.rebellesociety.com/2013/05/31/hot-sex-for-real-yogis/
dark matter... majora-weyl...
http://phys.org/news/2013-06-simple-theory-dark.html
Peace,
Stephen
T thought of the same as Spephen, here the arxive paper http://arxiv.org/abs/1211.0503
CDs within CDs?
I liberated a paywalled journal version of the paper at http://vixra.freeforums.org/simple-theory-may-explain-dark-matter-anapole-dark-matter-t77.html
To Stephen and Ulla:
I do not believe reduction of dark matter to some particle, be it neutralino or right-handed neutrino, or Majorana-Weyl neutrino, or something else.
The particle physicist's method of postulating some new particle to solve the problem fails also here. This approach combined with GUT ideology has led to the situation in which Nima Arkani Hamed concludes that the observed physics is impossible.
To me dark matter and dark energy represent something much deeper than some exotic particle with exotic properties: this something is related also to the secret of life, second law, consciousness, etc...
I like you're idea better. :)
Peace,
Stephen
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/06/130610152133.htm
well, further results on the nature of water...
and I find it interesting that lately the genes seeking the state of the mind like autism beyond the ensemble of genes may be telling something of the entangled connections within our consciousness... or as in todays articles fractal properties of baterial growth cultures.
I though that if this could be non-interactive, except at high speed, then, can it also be some intentional agent like your magnetic body? Then this structure would show intelligence, and your thesis that intelligence is bounded to matter would not be the whole story?
Can Life interact more with these magnetic structures, because living matter have another relation to time than ordinary matter? The symmetry breakings can create second order coherence, Like the windows of action. You use p-adics for it. At least it is worth to think over?
Can these structures also invoke on light at high speed?
http://phys.org/news/2013-06-unfrozen-mystery-reveals-secret.html
"The results indicate that dissociation of water molecules follows two different mechanisms. Some of the molecules begin to dissociate at much lower pressures and via a different path than was predicted in the classic 1964 paper."
"Our data paint an altogether new picture of ice," Guthrie commented. "Not only do the results have broad consequences for understanding bonding in H2O, the observations may also support a previously proposed theory that the protons in ice in planetary interiors can be mobile even while the ice remains solid."
About the anapole: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1002.3184.pdf
It is shown that this gauge structure is characterized by a non renormalizable interaction, which is radiatively generated at the one–loop. It is found that the resulting anapolemoment for off-shell particles, though free of ultraviolet divergences, is gauge dependent and thus it is not a physical observable. We also study some of its kinematical limits. In particular, it is shown that its value comes out to be zero when all particles are on–shell.
http://arxiv.org/abs/0804.0523 An interaction-free measurement protocol is described for a quantum circuit consisting of a superconducting qubit and a read-out Josephson junction. By measuring the state of the qubit one can ascertain the presence of a current pulse through the circuit at a previous time without any energy exchange between the qubit and the pulse.
2008,
My monologue again...
Look at this man, Pereira, also in earlier link. Amazing. http://www.ift.unesp.br/users/jpereira/articles.html
http://journalofcosmology.com/HoMultiverse.pdf or understanding the enormous energy of the early universe, classical field equations, including general relativity, must be quantized.
http://mnras.oxfordjournals.org/content/415/3/2744.abstract
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1004.1824v1.pdf
http://phys.org/news190027752.html
http://www.nikhef.nl/pub/services/biblio/preprints/12-024.pdf proof for supergravity?
Oh, here I goes on...and on...and on...
http://www.collective-evolution.com/2013/05/28/nasa-admits-they-are-working-to-travel-faster-than-the-speed-of-light/
Are y bad again?
Look: Sadly, many critics of string theory, having lost their case in the court of science, try to win it in the court of popular opinion. http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2013/jun/16/has-physics-gone-too-far
What y said to me :)
what the heck is y?
http://arxiv.org/ftp/physics/papers/0701/0701289.pdf
I remember I did my first matlab project on oscillator coupling
http://phys.org/news/2013-06-invisible-tug-of-war-bad-hearts-power.html
Isn't it just sad and pathetic that these spooks chose the name nucleon for their stupid secret project? They think they can just co-opt nature like that. hah!
http://phys.org/news/2013-06-distance-sugar-molecules.html
http://physics.aps.org/articles/v6/69 a four-quark matter?
http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/ja311828v
Here, we present artificial, self-assembled, light-harvesting complexes consisting of DNA scaffolds, intercalated YO-PRO-1 (YO) donor dyes and a porphyrin acceptor anchored to a lipid bilayer, conceptually mimicking the natural light-harvesting systems. A model system consisting of 39-mer duplex DNA in a linear wire configuration with the porphyrin attached in the middle of the wire is primarily investigated.
The versatility of DNA as a structural material is demonstrated through the construction of a more complex, hexagonal, light-harvesting scaffold yielding further increase in the effective absorption coefficient. Our results show that, by using DNA as a scaffold, we are able to arrange chromophores on a nanometer scale and in this way facilitate the assembly of efficient light-harvesting systems.
Post a Comment